I disagree with the answer posted here. An example to counter said answers would be "Get in the taxi." A Taxi is a form of public transportation, yet you would never say "Get on the taxi.", as saying that would imply that you would literally be climbing on top of the taxi.

In terms of airplanes, both "Get in the airplane." and "Get on the airplane." are two different ways of saying the same thing.

It might have more to do with the size of said vehicle, though I'm not entirely sure myself, it also depends on whether or not you can actually ride inside of said vehicle. Here are some more example sentences with this phrase.

"Get on the bus."

"Get in the taxi."

"Get on the blimp."

"Get in the submarine."

"Get in the tank." (Tank, as in the vehicle.)

"Get on your bike." (There is no "inside", therefore you could never be "in" the bike."

"Get on the boat". There is also an exception here, as you can also say "Get in the boat."

I disagree with the answer posted here. An example to counter said answers would be "Get in the taxi." A Taxi is a form of public transportation, yet you would never say "Get on the taxi.", as saying that would imply that you would literally be climbing on top of the taxi.In terms of airplanes, both "Get in the airplane." and "Get on the airplane." are two different ways of saying the same thing.It might have more to do with the size of said vehicle, though I'm not entirely sure myself, it also depends on whether or not you can actually ride inside of said vehicle. Here are some more example sentences with this phrase."Get on the bus.""Get in the taxi.""Get on the blimp.""Get in the submarine.""Get in the tank." (Tank, as in the vehicle.)"Get on your bike." (There is no "inside", therefore you could never be "in" the bike.""Get on the boat". There is also an exception here, as you can also say "Get in the boat."

舉報版權侵害

1

讃

這個回答有幫到你嗎？

請留下您的意見

嗯... (0)

有幫助 (0)

為什麼你認為是"嗯..."呢?

明顯的誤答

說明不完整

回答用的語言看不懂

回答跟問題沒有關係

其他原因

你的意見並不會顯示給其他用戶